Idraluna Archives

What I want to read

My reaction to this year's Bloggie Nominees is a sense that the 'median culture of play' represented in the list has drifted further from that which I participate in (relative to previous years), and accordingly I find the selected posts less apropos to my own advice needs & taste. With more time in the hobby, and especially after much more time spent playing games, I've become marginally more discerning about what blog posts I find useful.1

But rather than grousing about posts I'm not into, I've been trying to take a more constructive angle by reflecting on what I'm most excited to read. What am I looking to learn? For what problems am I seeking solutions? Up which which Jonses am I trying to keep?

Here's a rough list.2 I've added cluttered examples that came to mind, but tbh there are too many good posts out there, more than I even have time to properly read! (I will likely update this as I think of more):

Anyways, that's my list. To be clear, I have no expectation that the wider blogging culture should conform to my niche tastes. But I at least will try to align more of my own efforts to the kinds of things I want to read.

If your list is different, post about it! Curated lists are probably more useful to the right audience than anything selected by voting.

  1. Specifically: the reviews & advice nominees tend to favor different module design approaches than I prefer, there's a lot of material targeted at game designers rather than referees, & lots of interest in riffing on videogames over books & wargames. Some advice also strikes me as more oriented toward "trad" or narrative-focused games. None of this is a knock on the posts themselves, just personal reflection on how they don't align with my own taste.↩

  2. Note that there is some bloggies overlap. Despite some of my thinking on this being prompted by the awards, this isn't a "list of posts I think got snubbed by the nominations".↩