Idraluna Archives

What I want to read

My reaction to this year's Bloggie Nominees is a sense that the 'median culture of play' represented in the list has drifted further from that which I participate in (relative to previous years), and accordingly I find the selected posts less apropos to my own advice needs & taste. With more time in the hobby, and especially after much more time spent playing games, I've become marginally more discerning about what blog posts I find useful.1

But rather than grousing about posts I'm not into, I've been trying to take a more constructive angle by reflecting on what I'm most excited to read. What am I looking to learn? For what problems am I seeking solutions? Up which which Jonses am I trying to keep?

Here's a rough list.2 I've added cluttered examples that came to mind, but tbh there are too many good posts out there, more than I even have time to properly read! (I will likely update this as I think of more):

Anyways, that's my list. To be clear, I have no expectation that the wider blogging culture should conform to my niche tastes. But I at least will try to align more of my own efforts to the kinds of things I want to read.

If your list is different, post about it! Curated lists are probably more useful to the right audience than anything selected by voting.

  1. Specifically: the reviews & advice nominees tend to favor different module design approaches than I prefer, there's a lot of material targeted at game designers rather than referees, & lots of interest in riffing on videogames over books & wargames. Some advice also strikes me as more oriented toward "trad" or narrative-focused games. None of this is a knock on the posts themselves, just personal reflection on how they don't align with my own taste.

  2. Note that there is some bloggies overlap. Despite some of my thinking on this being prompted by the awards, this isn't a "list of posts I think got snubbed by the nominations".